
Read time: 6–7 minutes
Parent: “Why does it seem like school was harder back in my day?”
Me: “Well, in part, because some of it was…”
Graduation rates are rising, but reading and math proficiency are falling.
This post explains why those trends can happen at the same time, what changed after the pandemic, and what it means for families, colleges, and the workforce.
Talk to almost any parent and you will hear the same thing: “School feels easier now than it was when we were kids.”
At the same time, schools are graduating more students than ever.Both things can be true.
That is because education today is judged by two very different report cards:
Right now, those report cards tell very different stories.
Virginia’s 2024 NAEP results show a mixed pattern:
The Virginia Department of Education directly links these results to extended pandemic disruptions, including school closures and remote learning.
State assessment data tells a similar story.
According to Virginia proficiency trends compiled by Zelma and summarized by Brookings:
There has been some recovery since the lowest point of the pandemic.
However, students overall are less likely to meet grade-level expectations today than they were before 2020.
Now look at graduation rates.
According to the National Center for Education Statistics:
This increase continued even through pandemic disruption. So the tension becomes clear:
More students are earning diplomas on time, while fewer students are demonstrating strong reading and math skills.
This is not about schools failing or teachers caring less. It is about incentives, policies, and definitions of success that do not always align.
Learning, especially in reading and math, builds year after year. You cannot quickly make up missed foundations at scale. Graduation rates, however, can change faster because districts can adjust policies such as:
These changes can keep students moving toward diplomas, but they do not automatically rebuild academic skills.
The Fordham Institute argues that when policymakers emphasize graduation and completion metrics, schools respond logically. They raise completion by adjusting the requirements to earn credits rather than by ensuring mastery. From a system perspective, changing the standard to receive a diploma is often easier than changing instructional outcomes.
Many pandemic policies were created with good intentions. They were designed to keep students connected and prevent massive failure.
Examples include:
Even as schools reopened, many of these policies remained. They helped protect graduation rates but did not necessarily rebuild lost learning.
This distinction is critical.
They are related, but they are not the same.
Parents are not just being nostalgic. School often was harder in important ways. The difference is not always about tougher content. It is about stricter systems and fewer escape routes.
Here is what many parents experienced that students today experience less often:
Today, expectations can vary widely from class to class. That variability makes rigor feel uneven and confusing. At the same time, learning feels harder for students in new ways.
Phones, notifications, chronic absenteeism, and lower attention stamina make sustained focus more difficult. Virginia’s recent push for cell phone free schools reflects growing recognition that attention is now a major learning variable.
So when parents say school used to be harder, they are often describing more friction, more accountability, and fewer off-ramps, not necessarily more advanced material.
When diplomas increase but skills lag, the consequences show up later:
The diploma still matters. But it no longer guarantees readiness.
Raising graduation rates and rebuilding mastery do not have to conflict.
But it requires intentional choices:
The goal is not fewer diplomas. The goal is diplomas that truly represent readiness.
We did not lower expectations because people stopped caring. We changed the rules to help students through a crisis and many of those rules never fully reset. Now education faces a harder challenge:
How do we support students while also restoring mastery?
That answer matters for families, colleges, and the future workforce.
Share this: